A Case Study In Crime And Punishment

By Charles P. Pierce

Michal Czerwonka/Getty Images
There's a lot of talk about sentencing reform, as the country goes through one of its periodic spasms of rationality as regards its criminal justice system, most of which last only until another easily exploitable crime comes along. A lot of the current attention is rightly being paid to the ludicrous sentences handed down for drug offenses over the last 30 years, although the sudden spotlight being shined on solitary confinement is long overdue, as well.
But disproportionate sentences -- and mandatory minimums -- distort the sentences meted out for a number of crimes, especially under the joint-venture theory of criminal For example, in Boston, Chris Faraone once wrote about the case of Joe Donovan, a Cambridge man who was given a life sentence of life for his part in the death of a Norwegian man in 1992. When Donovan was 17 and a senior in high school, he got into a scuffle with an MIT student named Yngve Raustein. Donovan punched Raustein. As Donovan nursed his knuckles, one of his companions stabbed Raustein to death.
Donovan asked McHugh if he had stabbed someone while he was urinating. At that moment, McHugh told the others that he chased Donovan's sucker punch with a lethal shanking, and that he'd done it "just to see what it was like to watch somebody die." Looking back, says Donovan, "At this point I'm thinking he's sick in the head, and I told him to give me the knife. It was a crazy knife, like something you would see on a crazy redneck hunting show. Right then, I realized that he stabbed someone, and right after that the cops started coming, but I still didn't think that I was in much trouble for anything besides punching someone."
Extremely wrong. At trial, Donovan turned down a deal offered by the district attorney. He got slugged with the massive sentence he is now serving under the joint-venture theory. (The actual murderer, the guy who stabbed Raustein, got out in 2003.) Donovan has a parole hearing tomorrow. The joint-venture rule is something of an open invitation to prosecutorial coercion and general mischief. If we are going to reform the criminal justice system in the right way, it needs a look, too.
Which is not even to get into this remarkable study. Enough. Seriously.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kekerasan di Perkotaan

Kisah Seorang Preman Kupang (1)

Temuan Riset: Kepolisian dan Pemerintah Daerah Tidak Paham Apa itu Ujaran Kebencian